Shortcuts: Mobile | Active Topics | Newest Posts | Latest Freeware | Private Messaging | Contribute News | Archive 
  NEWS
  Search News
Browse by Category
News History
1SRC News RSS Feed
1SRC Podcast RSS Feed
Contribute News
  FORUMS
  Search Forums
Topic Specific
News
General
Applications
  Games
  Video
Deals & Promos
Developers
E-books
Mac / Linux
Medical
Podcast
Skins & Backgrounds
Wireless
Off-Topic
  Audio/Video
  Cellphones
  Digital Cameras
  Gaming
  Gadgets & Gizmos
  Non-Palm OS PDAs
  PCs/Laptops
  Tech Web
palm
pre
Foleo
T|X-Series
Z-Series
LifeDrive
Zire
Treo
Tungsten
Older Palms
Sony
VZ-Series
TH-Series
UX-Series
TJ-Series
NX-Series
TG-Series
NZ-Series
Older Clies
Tapwave
Zodiac
Garmin
iQue
Other Licensees
AlphaSmart
Fossil
Group Sense
Kyocera
LG
Samsung
Site Specific
Arcade
Comment/Suggest
  FREEWARE
  Search Freeware
Applications
Ebooks
Skins
Backgrounds
  ABOUT US
  Contact Us
Contribute News
About Us
Privacy Statement
  LOW PRICE SEARCH

Search for the lowest prices: 




  LINKS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Go Back   1src Forums > Topic Specific > Applications
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-15-2003, 05:38 AM   #1
fengwei007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189 fengwei007 is on a distinguished road
How fast (or slow) is your current Launcher?

I know over half Palm users here are using ZL as there default launcher right now, and I know most of us think ZL is the most powerfull and customizable Launcher in the market.. And I also know that still many of us are using other launchers like LX, ML, Clie Launcher, or even just the default launchers come with the PDAs.

Here now I don't want to compare how many features about the launchers you are using, I just want to see how fast or slow is your current LAUNCHERs?

How to compare?
Just run several default PIM apps like the Databook, ToDo, Address and Memo app come in ROM, and exit from them to the Launchers you are using, and record the average time it takes the Launcher to finish loading (all buttons, toolbars and app icons have been shown).

Conditions: no CPU overclock, all the up tool bar and bottom tool bar have to be shown, at least 9 apps in the current Launcher window/tab.

After testing, it'll be great if you could provide the following:
1. the PDA model
2. the launcher you are using
3. how many apps in your current launcher tab/window
4. the average time for the launcher to finish loading

I'm posting my result here first:
1. Sony SJ30
2. LX
3. 12 apps in the current tab
4. 0.7 sec average time for LX to finish loading (almost instant)

I have ZL installed also, the result is about 4.2 sec for ZL to finish
loading, which is pretty slower than LX.

What's your results here? Thanks for any input.

Cheers!
fengwei007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 06:06 AM   #2
n2ifp
Retired Member
 
n2ifp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 12,444 n2ifp is on a distinguished road
It's best if the test was separated for OS4 and OS5 Clies. ZL on my NX is blink of the eye quick, so in OS5 it's basically a non-issue. It all depends too on whether one is running a background image and if it is HiRes + and 65K color vs 256 color. The point is there can be a few variables that can skew the results.

BTW I have 126 apps in my launcher screen.

On the NX, I can't really say any launcher is slow and I would image it would be similar with the NZ90 and TG50
__________________
Cheers!
Larry Winward
T|T3 + SE T610 + SE HBH-65 = BT Heaven!
n2ifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 07:47 PM   #3
kp*
Registered User
Bronze Contributor
 
kp*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,379 kp* is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to kp* Send a message via Yahoo to kp*
Using ZL on an NR, I find the delay somewhat annoying. I'll probably get an NX80, and that's one of the biggest improvements I'm looking forward to with the new hardware.

As for my ZL tests:
VG up: To my main tab, 14 icons: 2.75 sec
To my "All" tab, 86 icons: 3.05 sec
VG down: To my main tab, 14 icons: 2.90 sec
To my "All" tab, 86 icons: 3.20 sec

Of course ZL being so customizable there are almost an infinite number of variations people might have that affect the results. I have text shadow, high density, and zoom turned off on the icons, for example. I also use a simple background, and 65K colors.

Glad to hear from the OS5 people that it's speedier!

Edit: Forgot to mention I don't have autosync on.

Last edited by kp* : 06-15-2003 at 10:15 PM.
kp* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 07:53 PM   #4
Alistar
Technowizard
 
Alistar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,133 Alistar is on a distinguished road
Yea, even with a background image in ZL I never see that please wait dialogue. It loads seemingly instantly.
In fact the the only time I have ever seen the please wait dialogue is when changing skins and even then not even long enough to read the words, if you didn't know what they already said, and if I start zlauncher from the default launcher.
Alistar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 08:05 PM   #5
fengwei007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189 fengwei007 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by n2ifp
It's best if the test was separated for OS4 and OS5 Clies. ZL on my NX is blink of the eye quick, so in OS5 it's basically a non-issue. It all depends too on whether one is running a background image and if it is HiRes + and 65K color vs 256 color. The point is there can be a few variables that can skew the results.

BTW I have 126 apps in my launcher screen.

On the NX, I can't really say any launcher is slow and I would image it would be similar with the NZ90 and TG50


Hmm, that's pretty fast. Guess we OS 4 user will have to swtich to OS5 ones to enjoy the beauties of apps like ZL. But for LX, I think there is no big difference no matter you are using an OS5 or OS4. That's probably the best part for LX than ZL.
fengwei007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 09:46 PM   #6
the_iceman
Support Our Troops!
Bronze Contributor
 
the_iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a Puddle Somewhere in Seattle
Posts: 1,833 the_iceman is on a distinguished road
alistar,

It, perhaps, could be because you might not have the 'Auto sync /Palm Launcher/' option turned on in the ZL PREFERENCES? I have mine turned on... and it seems to show up.... (for about 1/10 of a second) each time I exit an application and go back to the ZLauncher 'desktop' area.
the_iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 11:10 PM   #7
Utes Rule
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
LauncherX is fater for me...

I'm a registered owner of ML, SilverScreen (although the current version is CRAP compared to LX or ML or ZL) and LauncherX. I've also tried ZLauncher extensively and I have found that on my NR70, the fastest by a considerable margin is LauncherX, followed by ZLauncher and then MegaLauncher.

I'm hoping that IF a ML update comes out in July, that it is faster than the current 4.3. Also, I hope to see a new version of LauncherX in either July or August. That would be GREAT (I know that the developers are working on it).
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 11:34 PM   #8
pixelpainter
Vicariously Absent minded
 
pixelpainter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Palestine, IN USA
Posts: 329 pixelpainter is on a distinguished road
Re: LauncherX is fater for me...

Quote:
Originally posted by Utes Rule

I hope to see a new version of LauncherX in either July or August. That would be GREAT (I know that the developers are working on it).



Don't hold your breath, the development of LX is nonexistent.
__________________
Best Regards,

PixelPainter

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." ~ Albert Einstein
pixelpainter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 11:54 PM   #9
mrbjg4
Registered User
 
mrbjg4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ-USA.
Posts: 237 mrbjg4 is on a distinguished road
I know its not full screen, but CRS Launcher is instant (it's 27k!). That's why I use it.
mrbjg4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2003, 02:42 AM   #10
fengwei007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189 fengwei007 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by mrbjg4
I know its not full screen, but CRS Launcher is instant (it's 27k!). That's why I use it.


But for me, CRS Launcher is slower than either LX or the default launcher. Mainly is becuse that I use V3bhack to display hi-density OS5 app icons on my SJ30, which slows down CrsLauncher. LX is much faster.
fengwei007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.

  AD HOSTS ?
  GOOGLE ADS ?
  AMAZON ADS ?

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2001 Entity City, LLC. All rights reserved.