UX50 or Tungsten C?

[Sam K]

For those of you (like me) who want built in WiFi, which would you choose, the UX50 or the Tungsten C and why?

[EdFrmBrighthand]

I had a Tungsten C for a month or so but when the time came to pass it back, I wasn't too sad. The Wi-Fi range was simply inadequate for my needs. It could reach my living room but not my back porch. As I am frequently on the potch, I got tired of having to walk inside to check my email. And obviously I couldn't surf while outside.

The NX80V I just tested had a much better range. Heck, it reached all the way to my mailbox. (I could get my mail and my email simultaneously :) ) If the UX50 delivers the same range, it is the device for me.

[Sam K]

So what you're telling me is that the Wi-Fi range in the Tungsten C probably wouldn't be good enough to access the Verizon hot spots in Manhattan unless I was right next to them. That's the main reason I want a PDA with built-in Wi-Fi, so that I can access the hot spots. I guess I'll wait to see what the Wi-Fi range of the UX50 is before I purchase one.

[gfunkmagic]

Yeah, the wifi range of the NX80V is really amazing. The battery life is also much better than the earlier NX's, but still not as good as the T|C which has a massive battery. If the UX50 has the same range as the NX80v, then I will be impressed. However, I'm skeptical about the UX's battery performance...

[rened]

Originally posted by gfunkmagic
However, I'm skeptical about the UX's battery performance...

The variable cpu frequency might have a possitive effect. But only a 'objective' (whatever that may be) comparison will clarify this.

[EPSOLON]

neither or them they both sucks. thats only my point of view thx.

[n2ifp]

Originally posted by EPSOLON
neither or them they both sucks. thats only my point of view thx.

For you maybe, I am not interested in the TC either. Remember, the UX is for a niche market. For those who want to wardrive, get something else that has a "T" form factor. Something will be out soon enough, I know we all get impatient. He-he, I just picked up the NX80, until the UX comes out. The UX is more what I want for my usage, but I admit it's not for everyone.

[babsk]

T|C for me. I like the larger built-in memory and keyboard. (the keyboard is not for everyone, but I happen to like it).
WIFI range works fine in my house, although I admit that my NX70 with wifi card seems to have a better range. But for my use, it's the same difference-I don't use it outside, and the T|C picks up a signal everywhere inside just fine.

[jaimejr66]

I can not give up the Hi-res+ screens of my NX. But having 51 Meg of Ram available like on the T|C, would be a dream come true. Personally, I'm waiting on the OS 6 models to start coming out.

[arkaneslayer]

i currently hv a T|C. i kinda like it and the wifi range is not an issue to me. 400Mhz is really great and everyone's who's used it speak highly of the speed.

however, i love the 480x320 hires screen from sony. i used to own an NR70V ... great screen.

for me the issue would be 400Mhz, 64Meg vs 480x320 screen, 16 Meg? & 100+Mhz. tough choice. especially when i frequently use the wifi for surfing the net. 480x320 would be superb.

[Omnitron]

From those two, I'd probably still lean towards the Sony. For myself I'm still wanting to get more info on battery life and performance before I jump on the bandwagon.

Battery life is one of the things that made me start looking at the NX80 seriously. I like the idea of the UX50's expanded memory and battery pack, but the battery pack is a tad expensive, and it sounds like the memory will come with too many restrictions. If the interface is fast, smooth, and neat though... And if the battery lasts a decent amount of time in REAL usage (Not the 10 minutes or whatever usage per day they claim on some of the specs...) who knows, I may change my mind. :confused:

[dúnadan]

I currently use a T|C and won't go back to anything that has poor battery life or less than 32MB memory. Since there is an add-on battery pack for the UX, I might be interested in the series if a UX comes out with 32MB or more of user-accessible real memory.

[rened]

Originally posted by dúnadan
, I might be interested in the series if a UX comes out with 32MB or more of user-accessible real memory.

It will: 16+29=45Mb.

[Unregistered]

Originally posted by Omnitron
...I like the idea of the UX50's expanded memory and battery pack, but the battery pack is a tad expensive, ...

Sony things are alwayz expensive ... and have no 2nd hand value ... i'm still stuck with a sony battery pack for the NR70V today.

[newyorktd]

UX50.

I heard the WiFi range on the C is unacceptable.

;)

[Unregistered]

Originally posted by newyorktd
UX50.

I heard the WiFi range on the C is unacceptable.

;)

i use it indoors - so the range is alrite all around my apartment.

[TechnoCat]

There are two reasons I don't have a T|C right now. First, the WiFi range is reported poor, and second, no stereo on the headphone jack.

This isn't, to me, just a communications device. I travel way too much, and being able to enjoy music and movies on it is a prime goal. And yes, I have an MP3 player, but it is tiny, not expandable, and doesn't do movies.