Versamail 3.5 Owners

[rpayne]

So was the 3.5 upgrade worth it in your opinion?

Is VM more stable on the TX and cause less resets?

Any feedback is appreciated as I am considering the upgrade.

Thanks.

[mrp123]

I tried & it crashe more often!
enotar

What a beutiful first impression for an "upgrade".

[archangel]

It seems the same to me. My LD crashes just as much with 3.5 as it did with the older version.

[drwho]

It seems bit quicker to me. Doesn't crash ever, but then neither did original. I think it was worth upgrading.

[AZ-TX]

It is not any more stable or any less stable than 3.1c, for me. I like the addition of the address autocomplete. Based on what I have used so far, I don't think it was worth the $9.99.

[Dan_Aykroyd]

Where do you get the update? I have the LD and v3.1C is on it but when googling for 'versamail' all I get is the 2.5 version...

Thanks.

[dmitrygr]

you buy it on palm.com

[deuse]

I would love to know why PALM charges for there updates
but microsoft dont ??

I.E windows mobile update sare free...palm..Charge ya...not fair..

[2XS]

or on palmgear.com...

IMAP support worx better in my view. no more softresets, when inbox-folder is empty.

gr33tz 2XS

[rpayne]

so this is obviously a update more about features rather than fixing stability issues....I'll probably pass for now.

[tegodwin]

:) I find Versamail 3.5 much more stable than the version supplied with the TX. Previous version often caused resets with certain e-mails. Well worth the upgrade.

Trev

[rpayne]

Well I upgraded to Versamail 3.5 anyway in hopes that it would be more stable.

I'm sad to say that though there are some nice features, VM3.5 is not any more stable on my TX.

In my experiences, Avantgo, Versamail and Blazer cause many crashes. And I don't even use hacks etc.

Oh well...

[palmjob]

:) I find Versamail 3.5 much more stable than the version supplied with the TX. Previous version often caused resets with certain e-mails. Well worth the upgrade.

Trev
Agreed. Much more stable on my TX as well.